Results Approved for the Lepton Photon 2003 Symposium


Results are available for the following analyses:

Additional information for the DZero collaborators can be found on the Higgs group documents pages. Non-DZero speakers may request analyses notes to the conveners. Other analyses results are available under the Dzero Higgs group public documents.


W(->enu) + jets with b-tagging

These final states are relevant for the Higgs searches in WH associated production. Emphasis is put on properties of jets with or withaut b-tagging. Details of the analysis are documented in the D0 note 4224. A few plots from this note on jet properties (data vs Pythia and Alpgen+Pythia in particular) can be found here.

Event selection procedure includes the following


Event kinematic selections

In the following plots the dots with error bars correspond to data, while various historgrams represent the background contributions. The QCD background is always extracted from the collider data.

W transverse mass (inclusive evts) compared to Pythia

W transverse mass spectrum (inclusive/any jet)
compared to Pythia

(.eps version)

W transverse mass (>= 2jet evts) compared to Alpgen

W transverse mass spectrum in >= 2jet evts
compared to Alpgen

(.eps version)

DR(jj) distance (in untagged jet evts) compared to Alpgen

Distance in R between jets
compared to Alpgen
(.eps version)

DR(jj) distance (in at least 1 b-tag jet) evts & Alpgen

Distance in R between jets in >=1 b-tag evts
 compared to Alpgen
(.eps version)

Di-jet invariant mass, 1b-tag

Di-jet invariant mass in >= 1 b-tag evts
(.eps version)

Di-jet mass in >= 2b-tag-jets evts

Di-jet invariant mass in double-b-tag evts
(.eps version)


e+2b-jet Higgs candidate (ttbar: e+mu+2bjets)

Higgs candidate event 6854840, run 169261
e+2jets; one (both) jet is tagged by secondary
vertex (JLIP) algorithm
(presence of the isolated muon indicates
this might be a ttbar background event)

Zoom in: 1 secvtx tag; 2 JLIP tags

Zoom into event 6854840, run 169261:
  a cross indicates the primary vertex,
and the ellipse -- secondary vertex


Searches for Higgs in H -> WW(*) -> ee/emu/mumu final states

These searches select events with two isolated, high pT leptons (criteria given below) and significant missing ET (MET). In addition, requirements are made to reject Z/gamma* Drell-Yan processes and the Standard Model WW background. The latter is suppressed by exploiting the spin correlations in the WW* decay. The backgrounds tend to give dilepton pairs which are back-to-back in the plane transverse to the beam, while the signal decays give leptons which have a positive correlation in their direction. The tables show comparisons between predicted backgrounds and observed event yields in data, and the figures compare the D(phi) distributions for backgrounds and signal.

Lepton ID and analysis requirements

Lepton kinematic selections

ee final state
  • e1: pT > 15 GeV
  • e2: pT > 12 GeV
  • |eta| < 1.3
emu final state
  • e: pT > 12 GeV
  • mu: pT > 7 GeV
  • |etae| < 1.3, |etamu| < 2
mumu final state
  • mu1: pT > 20 GeV
  • mu2: pT > 10 GeV
  • |eta| < 2


We first show the combined result for all three final states (ee/emu/mumu: D0 note 4225) followed by individual analysis (ee/emu: D0 note 4207; mumu: D0 note 4223)

Combined limit on sxB(H->WW)

Higgs production cross section times BR(H->WW) excluded with the current D0 data
(and LEP experiments), along with the expectations from various models.
This result is a combination of the ee, emu and mumu analyses.

(.eps version)


H -> WW(*) -> ee
Signal efficiencies, predicted background, and observed yields as function of
(the Higgs mass dependent) event selection requirements


Higgs signal efficiency, ee

Cut flow table, ee
Table 13: Expected number of background events and the number of observed
data events
at each step of the selection procedure for a Higgs mass of 160 GeV

D(phi) plots, ee
(.eps versions: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)

H -> WW(*) -> emu
Signal efficiencies, predicted background, and observed yields as function of
(the Higgs mass dependent) event selection requirements


Higgs signal efficiency, emu

Cut flow table, emu
Table 19: Expected number of background events and the number of observed
data events
at each step of the selection procedure for a Higgs mass of 160 GeV

D(phi) plots, emu
(.eps versions: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)

Combined limit plot, ee+emu

Cross section times BR excluded with the current D0 ee+emu data
(and LEP experiments), along with the expectations from various models.

(.eps version)


H -> WW(*) -> mumu
Signal efficiencies, predicted background, and observed yields as function of
(the Higgs mass dependent) event selection requirements

 

Higgs signal efficiency, mumu (tab.5)
Higgs signal efficiency, mumu (tab.6)

Cut flow tab.9, mumu


E_T missing distribution
ET missing distribution in mumu final states
(.eps version)

D(phi) plots, mumu
Azimuthal opening angle D(phi) between two muons after various cuts
(from top left to bottom right): Z selection, invariant mass, ET missing and ETHAD

(.eps version)

Limit plot, mumu
Higgs production cross section times BR(H->WW) excluded with the current D0 mumu data
(.eps version)



Searches for doubly-charged Higgs in H++ -> mu+mu+ decays

Doubly charged Higgs bosons appear in left-right symmetric models and in Higgs triplet models. Current searches assume the H++/-- decay branching ratio to like-sign muons to be 100%.
Details of the analysis can be found in
D0 note 4217.

Muon ID and analysis requirements

dimuon mass spectra
Dimuon mass spectra at various steps of the event selection procedure
(.eps version)

H++ exclusion plot

Confidence level of the signal as a function of the H++ mass,
for the left- and right-handed Higgs bosons
(.eps version)


E-mail to avto@fnal.gov, hobbs@fnal.gov