Any comments or suggestions on this proposal should be directed to Elizabeth Gallas (eggs@fnal.gov) or Andy White (WHITE@UTAHEP.UTA.EDU). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPOSAL TO INCLUDE ICD PMT SHIELDING IN THE SOLENOID TEST PLANNED FOR 1998 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- The ICD group has proposed to put an iron block just below each of the 4 pig troughs in Run 2 to shield the ICD PMTs from the magnetic field. This iron will cause a local distortion of the field in this region. Current calculations indicate that the force on the iron will be less than 60% of the weight of the blocks in all field configurations (solenoid and/or torroids on and/or off), and the corresponding decentering force on the solenoid is non-trivial but within safety limits. We propose to include one or all of the 4 iron blocks in the detector for the D0 solenoid test currently scheduled for July or August 1998. In addition, one of these blocks could be contained in a light-tight crate which is partially instrumented to 1) measure the field at a few different locations in the crate, 2) measure light using some Hamamatsu PMTS from an LED based calibration system. Our reasons for participating in this test are many-fold: 1. We'd like to assure ourselves that the calculation of the field and forces reflect reality for the sake of the safe and reliable operation of both the ICD and the solenoid. 2. Ransom has tested the tubes and shielding in a variety of magnetic field environments which we believe reflect the range of possible field configurations. We have found that the tubes are quite susceptable to changes in the direction of the field. While we believe we have found a shielding configuration which will work, local field distortions are difficult to anticipate. We'd like to see how well the phototubes work in the true magnetic field environment. 3. Going through the exercise of mounting the iron in a crate below the pig troughs will be very helpful. In the commissioning of the Run 2 detector, there will be many other complicating issues. For example, a light-tight rectangular box containing hundreds of delicate fibers (fiber backplane) will be mounted inside the back end of the ICD crate in Run 2. We'd rather not do this for the first time during a tight installation schedule a few weeks before we roll in. 4. The ICD group is currently entertaining 2 calibration options in Run 2. The first is to learn to reuse the Run 1 laser system in a useful way. The second is to try an LED based calibration system. We will likely test some version of an LED based system in the solenoid test.