Glossary of the dump abbreviations: Run/Event: 64583/ 10017; Reco: 11.19; NEl = 1; Nph = 1; NJet R=0.3/0.5/0.7: 3/2/2; MET(r) = 15.32( 15.07) [Run, event nos.; reco version; number of electrons and photons (see the definition in the Ntuple description); number of non-EM jets found with cone algorithm of R=0.3/0.5/0.7; missing ET from PNUT(4) corrected for the hot cells and the same after revertexing in parentheses] HT/EL/ST=HT+EL: 116.26/ 181.35/ 297.61 [HT = sum of R=0.7 cone jet ET for all jets; EL = sum of electron/photon ET; ST=HT+EL] NRVtx = 1; Zrv = 18.33 +- 0.87; NVtx = 1; Zv = 18.40 +- 1.13; [Number of tracks used for revertexing; revertexed vertex z-position with its error; number of RECO vertices; their z-positions and errors] Electrons/Photons: E/P# E ET ETr DEta Phi Chi ISO EMF dEdx dEdxr Sig Sigr Lk4 Lk5 ZVr R RV El 1 178.23 129.40 129.39 -0.69 1.05 18.13 0.01 0.99 0.87 1.88 2.09 1.97 0.02 0.01 18.33+- 0.87 0.00 0.00 Ph 1 93.24 51.94 51.96 -1.07 5.13 45.62 0.04 0.99 0.00 -1.00 0.00 0.00+- 0.00 0.00 0.00 [Type of EM object and its ID; E; ET; revertexed ET; detector Eta; Phi; H-matrix Chi**2; energy isolation, electromagnetic fraction, ionization from RECO; ionization for the closest track found by the revertexing procedure (or a flag returned by ELE_TRACKS if negative); track match significance from RECO; track match significance for the closest track found by the revertexing procedure (or a flag returned by ELE_TRACKS if negative); 4-variable electron likelihood; 5-variable electron likelihood; position of the revertexed vertex calculated just from this EM object (same as ZRvtx in NRVtx = 1); ratio of hit wires in the HITSINFO road in the CDC/FDC; ratio of hit wires in the HITSINFO road in the VTX - this variables were not filled or filled incorrectly for RECO versions below 12.20 so a caution is required - they in principle can be used for versions 12.13+.] Good R=0.5 jets (2): [Number of good jets mean jets (in parentheses) passing standard quality cuts: 0.05 < EMF < 0.95, ICDF < 0.4; CHF < 0.4, RHot <10. Jets which do not pass are simply trashed, but the events are kept. This block is for R=0.5 cone; the next one is for R=0.7.] # E ET ETr DEta Phi CHF ICDF EMF RHot 1 94.53 70.44 70.46 -0.65 3.75 0.02 0.09 0.38 2.91 2 165.73 24.34 24.34 2.71 3.51 0.00 0.00 0.40 1.81 [Good jet ID; energy; ET; detector eta; Phi; coarse hadronic energy fraction; ICD energy fraction; electromagnetic energy fraction; ratio of the hottest and next-to-hottest cell energies.] Good R=0.7 jets (2): # E ET ETr DEta Phi CHF ICDF EMF RHot 1 118.52 91.63 91.65 -0.59 3.87 0.02 0.07 0.37 2.91 2 167.54 24.61 24.60 2.71 3.51 0.00 0.00 0.40 1.81 [Same as above for R=0.7 cone jets.] NMu = 2 [Number of reconstructed PMUO tracks] # Pt DEta CLEANMU OK IFW4 Ecal Efrc HFrc Bdl 1 2.31 2.17 9DB0064 0 0 0.93 0.00 0.00 0.83 2 2.08 1.11 DFB03BC 0 0 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 [Muon ID; Pt; detector eta; CLEANMU status; 1 if passes default quality mask; IFW4 word; calorimeter energy along the track; fraction of hit cells in the calorimeter; same in the hadronic calorimeter; integral B dl] Masses: Meer/Mee = 149.07/148.97; Mjjr5/Mjjr7/Mjj7 = 220.61/245.75/245.76; DM(e1j1,e2j2)/(e1j2,e2j1) = -.10/1.15 [Mass of the two leading (in ET) EM objects after/before revertexing; mass of the two leading (in ET) jets for cone R=0.5, after revertexing/R=0.7, after revertexing/R=0.7, before revertexing and bad jet clean-up; Delta M/Mavrg for two EM-jet combinations.] Jet# El1 (0.5) El2 El1 (0.7) El2 El1 (NR7) El2 1 186.49 80.42 215.24 87.13 215.16 87.10 2 322.70 237.52 324.49 238.80 324.49 238.81 [Two leading good jets and two leading EM objects pair masses: rows correspond to jet 1 and jet 2 (can be different for different cone sizes); Firts two columns are EM1 and EM2 and jets with cone R=0.5 after revertexing and clean-up; second two columns are teh same for R=0.7 cone; last two columns are R=0,7 non-revertexed jets before clean-up (given as a cross check only). I agree that the notation is somewhat obscure and will fix it in the next version of the dump by reversing jet and EM axes. Information for the recombined FSR jets will be included as well.] Greg Landsberg, 04/07/97