Mail Describing the Large Tile Bug
From: MSUPA::WEERTS "Man van Staal" 20-DEC-1995 13:37:00.06
To: @CONVENER,SPOKES
CC: ABOLINS,WEERTS
Subj: Large tile trigger problem.
Michigan State Univ., Dec-20-1995
Dear physics groups:
over the last few days Dan Owen has found a error in triggering on jets
with large tiles. This problem exists for all data using large tiles ( 0.8 x
1.6 in eta,phi). The cause of this error is the following: when L1 triggers
on a large tile a list of large tiles above threshold is transferred to L2. To
enable the L2 jet algorithm to start from a seed trigger tower ( 0.2 x 0.2 in
eta,phi), the Et weighted eta,phi position of trigger towers contributing to
the large tile is calculated. The trigger tower in that position is used as
the center for constructing a cone. The energy in the cone is compared to the
L2 threshold. The problem is in the calculation of the eta,phi position from
the large tile. It has been found that this position sometimes ( frequency
depends on Et and how close one is to the threshold of the large tile) is
outside the physical eta,phi boundaries of the tile. This is obviously wrong
and Dan has indeed found an error in the code that is used in L2 to calculate
the position. It is due to not using exactly the same Et in numerator and
denominator, when mimicking the zero suppression in L1. However the problem
only exists in L2; at L1 everything is done properly.
The result of this is that the trigger efficiencies you use for jets in your
analyses may be wrong ( at least in the turn-on part). However it depends
critically on how you determine those efficiencies. So please check this and
for more detailed information you should get your L2 representative involved.
It is not at all clear how large the effect on your efficiencies will be,
because it depends on how they are determined and on the cuts used in your
final analyses. As long as you safely stay away from the trigger turn on
point, it most likely is not more then a few percent effect. But it has to be
checked.
Harry
<\PRE>
Gordon Watts -- 12/21/95