Received: from sbhep1.physics.sunysb.edu (sbhep1.physics.sunysb.edu [129.49.30.3]) by d0sgim.fnal.gov (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id KAA29207 for <meena@d0sgim.fnal.gov>; Thu, 10 Dec 1998 10:18:45 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <199812101618.KAA29207@d0sgim.fnal.gov>
Received: from sblcjh.physics.sunysb.edu by sbhep.physics.sunysb.edu (MX V4.2
          VAX) with SMTP; Thu, 10 Dec 1998 11:18:54 EST
To: Meenakshi Narain <meena>
Subject: Re: main ring and mujets
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 10 Dec 1998 10:00:29 CST."
    <199812101600.KAA28865@d0sgim.fnal.gov>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 11:19:13 +43151526
From: hobbs@sbhep.physics.sunysb.edu

Hi Meena,

   No idea about Rockwell.   I tried email with no response, and I talked with
Maris Abolins about a month ago.  Maris said Tom is making very little
progress.

   We used the events you processed for us (thanks...).  We made no further
corrections to the muons -- I looked to measure various other properties like
pt resolution, (eta,phi) inefficiency and angular correlations (tags vs. high
pt) but never found anything signficant with the small statistics I had.  Since
a 5% fractional systematic on roughly 10% of the lumi gives a 0.5% effect, I
decided that since the simple things showed no effects, I would use a crude
upper bound on the systematic rather than spend lots of time to perfect the
error.

            John