| Source | mt fit EC | mt fit CC+EC |
| CC-EC Z mass stat. error | 37 | 16 |
| EC-EC Z mass stat. error | 179 | 34 |
| EC W stat. error | 107 | 21 |
| CC-EC Z width stat. error | 47 | 14 |
| EC-EC Z width stat. error | 56 | 4 |
| FDC radial scale | 16 | 4 |
| FDC-EC radial scale | 23 | 6 |
| ECEM offset | 50 | 4 |
| hadronic response | 16 | 10 |
| hadronic resolution | 45 | 21 |
| EC W background | 21 | 4 |
| 35 | 15 | |
| pt(W) | 22 | 9 |
| Width(W) | 10 | 6 |
| radiative corrections | 4 | 1 |
We can compare the individual results obtained from the ECN and ECS data separately and obtain the good agreements:
MW(ECN) - MW(ECS) = 33 +/- 210 MeV (mt fit)
MW(ECN) - MW(ECS) = -213 +/- 253 MeV (pt(e) fit)
MW(ECN) - MW(ECS) = 15 +/- 319 MeV (pt(nu) fit)
Back the to main page