For the Public - Plain English Summaries of DØ Publications

Search for Third Generation Leptoquarks

Introduction

The world we live in is made from a handful of elementary particles. The current understanding has twelve particles and their corresponding antiparticles out of which normal matter, like atoms, is composed. The twelve particles can be separated into two groups of six based on how they are affected by the strong nuclear force. Some particles, called leptons, are unaffected by the strong force under any circumstances. The most familiar lepton is the electron. Other members of this group include neutrinos and the muon and tau particles. The second group consists of quarks. Quarks do feel the strong nuclear force and it dominates their existence so much that we can not directly observe single quarks, but only combinations of quarks bound together by the strong force. Protons and neutrons are examples of particles made from bound quarks. This Table shows the relationship between the particles:

The six quarks and six leptons are each grouped in three pairs by the weak nuclear force which causes transitions between the two members of a pair. Some forms of radioactive decay are due to this. The three pairs of quarks and three pairs of leptons are ordered by mass. For leptons, the electron and its neutrino constitute the lowest mass pair, which we designate as the first generation of leptons. Similarly, the muon and its neutrino are the second generation, and the tau and its neutrino the third generation. The three quark generations are the up and down quark (from which protons and neutrons are made), the strange and charm quarks, and the top and bottom quarks. As the second and third generation particles are heavier, the weak nuclear force causes these particles to decay to the lightest leptons and quarks. Thus normal atoms are made from only first generation particles with the heavier generations existing only briefly either as the results of high energy interactions, or in the very hot early universe.

At the present time, we do not have any understanding why nature has three (and seemingly only three) generations of leptons and quarks. We also do not understand why they both come in three generations and it is tempting to ascribe the equality of the number of lepton and quark generations to a new, as yet unknown, higher symmetry. One such higher grouping predicted in many theories is the existence of new massive particles called leptoquarks which, in some sense, are more fundamental. Leptoquarks have the properties of both types of particles and would decay into a lepton and a quark. Three different types of leptoquarks would need to exist, and we label them first, second and third generation leptoquarks. Each generation of leptoquarks is constrained by experimental evidence to decay to only leptons and quarks of its own generation. So first generation leptoquarks decay to up or down quarks and an electron or electron-neutrino.

The Experiment

Recently, the DØ Collaboration at Fermilab completed a search for third generation leptoquarks. Previous searches had set limits on the mass of possible first or second generation leptoquarks. Third generation leptoquarks will decay to top or bottom quarks plus a tau or tau-neutrino. One possible decay mode is to a tau neutrino plus a b quark. This can occur if the electric charge of the leptoquark is 1/3. This is the channel used in the DØ search. The most likely way to produce leptoquarks at the Fermilab collider is in leptoquark-antileptoquark pairs. As each decays in the same way, we search for a final state composed of two neutrinos and two bottom quarks.

Bottom quarks decay to charm quarks which then decay to strange quarks. These decays are caused by the weak nuclear force. About 10% of the time, each weak decay produces a muon. We identify a bottom quark by the presence of a muon associated with a spray of strongly interacting debris made from quarks. This spray of particles is called a ``jet''. This same technique was used to identify bottom quarks coming from the decay of a top quark when the top quark was discovered in 1995.

Two components of the DØ detector allow us to identify bottom quark decay to a muon plus a jet. The first is the calorimeter which is made from plates of uranium immersed in liquid argon. Particles made from quarks (like protons and pions) plus photons and electrons will undergo many interactions with the uranium creating a ``shower'' of additional particles. These particles can be detected through their ionization in the liquid argon. Summing up all the ionization energy in a cone of about 35 degrees allows us to measure the energy of the jet. Unlike particles which shower in the calorimeter, muons can travel through material slowly losing energy through ionization. To detect muons, we place a thick iron magnet after the calorimeter, and identify any particle which passes through both the calorimeter and the magnet as a muon. The magnet also curves the muon tracks and we use the amount of curvature to determine the muon's energy. As we are searching for a final state with two bottom quarks, we require that there be at least two jets with at least one of the jets having a muon close to it.

Neutrinos are very weakly interacting particles and travel through our detector without leaving any traces of information. To infer that a proton-antiproton collision produced one or more energetic neutrinos, we look for an imbalance in the detected energy. We define a quantity called missing energy by vectorially summing all the energy in the calorimeter and in detected muons. The horizontal and vertical components of these energy sums are combined to determine the missing energy. If the value for missing energy is large, this is most likely due to the presence of neutrinos. As seen in the Figure below, requiring the missing energy be greater than 35 GeV leaves only two collisions in our data. Also shown are the distributions for simulated leptoquark decays with a leptoquark mass of 100 GeV/c2. Leptoquarks would produce energetic neutrinos and thus have missing energy larger than our 35 GeV requirement.

The Result

We can attempt to understand the source of the two collisions which have a neutrino plus bottom quarks final state. Top-antitop quark decays produce multiple bottom quarks and missing energy, but with additional, energetic jets. W boson decays to a muon and a neutrino can occasionally mimic a bottom quark decay. We estimate that there are about 1.5 top-antitop decays and 1 W boson decays in our sample. Thus the estimated amount from known processes is in good agreement with what we see in the data. As we do not observe an excess, there can not be very many collisions which produce leptoquark pairs. A statistical analysis sets the number of such pairs at four or fewer. We can use this to set a limit on the probability to produce a leptoquark pair in any given proton-antiproton collision.

Most proton-antiproton collisions do not produce massive particles such as leptoquarks. The number of leptoquarks we might observe in our detector depends on a production probability multiplied by the number of proton-antiproton collisions and then multiplied by our detection efficiency. We know the number of detected leptoquarks is less than four and that there were about a billion proton-antiproton collisions. The detection efficiency for leptoquark pairs is calculated using a simulation program. Using a muon near a jet to identify bottom quark decays limits the efficiency to values under 3.5%. Knowing these three terms allows us to calculate the upper limit on the third generation leptoquark production probability; that is we know the probability must be less than this value. These upper limits are shown in the figure as a function of leptoquark mass. The scale on this figure is in ``cross section in picobarns (pb)'' which is directly related to probability. As an example, a 10 pb process occurs about 200 times in 1 billion proton-antiproton collisions.

If leptoquarks exist, we can use theory to calculate the probability of producing them in proton-antiproton collisions. Since the strong nuclear force affects leptoquarks the same way as quarks, the production of leptoquark pairs is similar to producing heavy quark pairs, with heavier objects being harder to produce. Our figure shows the theoretical cross section for the production of leptoquark pairs. The intersection of our limit curve with the theory band is at 94 GeV/c2. This is our lower limit on the mass of a charge 1/3 third generation leptoquark. If the leptoquark mass were below this, we would have expected to see more events in our detector. The absence of any signal allows us to set this limit.

For futher information contact Prof. David Hedin or Dr. Vladimir Sirotenko, Northern Illinois University, email: hedin@niu.edu or sirotenko@niuhep.physics.niu.edu

Return to Plain English Summaries listing

last modified 8/6/2001   email DØ
Security, Privacy, LegalFermi National Accelerator Laboratory